Cena SolchatCHAT

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is considering pausing its civil fraud case against TRON founder Justin Sun to explore a possible resolution that could benefit both parties and the public. In a letter sent on Wednesday to the U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos in Manhattan, attorneys representing Sun and the SEC requested a pause in the case, proposing to provide a status update 60 days following the stay, as originally reported by Reuters . The case , filed in March 2023, accuses Sun and his companies of illegally distributing Tronix ( TRX ) and BitTorrent ( BTT ) and artificially inflating TRX trading volume. Specifically, the SEC accused Sun of selling TRX and BTT tokens as investments without proper registration through unregistered “bounty programs.” These programs encouraged interested parties to promote the tokens on social media and chat groups, and create BitTorrent accounts in exchange for receiving TRX and BTT. The SEC also claimed that Sun and his companies conducted monthly giveaways of BTT to U.S. investors who already held TRX in their wallets or on certain exchanges. Additionally, the SEC accused Sun of wash trading, creating the illusion of active trading and liquidity in the markets for these tokens. Specifically, from April 2018 to Feb. 2019, Sun allegedly instructed his employees to carry out over 600,000 wash trades of TRX using two trading accounts he controlled. These trades involved manipulating the market with daily wash trades of between 4.5 million and 7.4 million TRX. To execute this scheme, Sun allegedly supplied a large quantity of TRX. Additionally, he was accused of selling TRX in the secondary market, which resulted in $31 million in proceeds. Finally, Sun also hired several high-profile celebrities to promote these tokens without disclosing their compensation. The SEC has also charged eight celebrities, including Lindsay Lohan, Akon, and Austin Mahone, for unlawfully promoting TRX and/or BTT without revealing that they were paid for these endorsements and the specific amounts they received. Prior to this, Justin Sun was in another legal spotlight when the blockchain protocol Chain considered taking legal action against him. This was sparked by Sun’s allegations that the company was involved in Onyxcoin ( XCN ) market manipulation—an accusation that seems particularly ironic in light of the Sun’s charges filed by the SEC. Sun made these allegations in a post on Jan. 24, claiming that Chain was using high leverage and contracts that could harm exchange users. He suggested that crypto exchanges should be cautious and indicated he would report Chain’s supposed illegal activities to the SEC and DOJ. In response, Chain rejected Sun’s accusations, stating that it does not engage in trading its XCN and pointing out that the XCN token is managed by OnyxDAO. Following this, Sun reiterated his accusations, this time directing attention to OnyxDAO and urging regulatory bodies to investigate.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has voiced concerns over criticisms directed at Ethereum’s stance on blockchain-based gaming applications. During a Wednesday AMA session on the chat app Tako, Buterin addressed user Mable Jiang’s inquiry about moments in the past year that left him frustrated or disappointed with the Ethereum Foundation, its community, or the industry. Jiang also asked if he had ever considered taking a break. In response, Buterin expressed his disappointment, particularly over criticisms that Ethereum is “bad and intolerant” for not embracing blockchain-based casinos as openly as other networks. “Perhaps the most disappointing thing for me recently was when someone said that Ethereum is bad and intolerant because we don’t respect the ‘casinos’ on the blockchain enough, and other chains are happy to accept any application, so they are better.” He stated. Despite occasional online rants about the network, Buterin, however, noted he finds comfort in personal interactions with the Ethereum community, most of whom remain committed to the platform’s original values. “I have a responsibility to this community and cannot abandon them. We Ethereum need to work together to create the world we want to see,” he added. Buterin also suggested potential strategic shifts to enhance the network, emphasizing the need for structural improvements for the network and greater decentralization within the Ethereum Foundation. He noted that the foundation, which currently facing a backlash for lack of neutrality, might need to be less neutral at the application layer and take a more active role in supporting certain initiatives. “This will require some changes,” he stated, adding, “But this project is worth doing.” Notably, Buterin’s response comes amid an ongoing debate in the blockchain space about balancing ethical considerations with open access. Some networks, like Solana, have taken a more permissive approach, welcoming applications across various sectors, including gambling and speculative ventures. However, this openness has also led to high-profile failures, such as the collapse of LIBRA, a meme coin on the Solana network. Recently, LIBRA collapsed, wiping out $4.5 billion in investor funds and causing a 15% drop in Solana’s value. Ethereum, in contrast, has long positioned itself as a network focused on decentralization, innovation, and long-term sustainability. These qualities have attracted institutional interest, with entities like BlackRock launching tokenized investment funds on the Ethereum network. Meanwhile, beyond his frustrations, Buterin remains actively engaged in Ethereum’s evolution, particularly its scalability through Layer 2 (L2) solutions. In January, he reaffirmed Ethereum’s commitment to scaling via L2s, identifying key challenges such as insufficient space for BLOB objects and L2 heterogeneity. He detailed upcoming upgrades, such as the Pectra update, which aims to enhance Ethereum’s transaction throughput with long-term goals, including achieving 100,000 transactions per second (TPS). He also underscored the importance of Ethereum’s economic model, advocating for ETH to serve as a “triple point asset,” functioning as a means of exchange, a consumable product, and a store of value. To strengthen Ethereum’s economic position, he proposed incentivizing L2 projects, optimizing rollup revenue structures, and adjusting BLOB pricing strategies.

Fed's Barkin: Fed often suffers from cyber attacks Fed Chairman Barkin said during a fireside chat that the Fed is often attacked by cyber attacks. He also said that inflation is expected to continue to decline and the basic economic conditions of the United States are very he…

Recent $OGC CURRENT PRICE STANDS, WITH CHAT ANALYSIS TO SHOW FUTURE UPRISING As of today, January 2, 2025, the current price of OGC (OGC) is $0.00486. Chat Analysis and Future Uprising Predicting the future price of any cryptocurrency, including OGC, is inherently speculative and carries significant risk. However, we can analyze certain factors that might influence its future price: Factors Influencing OGC's Price: Market Sentiment and Adoption: The overall sentiment and adoption of cryptocurrencies can significantly impact OGC's price. Positive news and increased adoption can lead to price appreciation, while negative news or regulatory hurdles can cause a decline. Technological Developments: OGC's price can be influenced by its technological advancements, such as improvements in its blockchain technology, scalability solutions, or new use cases. Competition: The competitive landscape within the cryptocurrency market can also affect OGC's price. The emergence of competing cryptocurrencies with similar functionalities or superior technology could pose a threat to OGC's market share. Regulatory Environment: Government regulations and policies related to cryptocurrencies can have a significant impact on their prices. Favorable regulations can boost investor confidence and drive prices up, while stricter regulations can dampen investor enthusiasm and lead to price declines. Chat Analysis and Future Uprising: While chat analysis can provide insights into market sentiment and potential trends, it's essential to remember that it's not a foolproof method for predicting future price movements. Key Considerations: Data Quality: The accuracy of chat analysis depends heavily on the quality and reliability of the data used. Biased or incomplete data can lead to misleading conclusions. Market Volatility: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and prices can fluctuate significantly in short periods. Chat analysis may not be able to capture these rapid price swings. Human Interpretation: Chat analysis often involves human interpretation of textual data, which can introduce subjectivity and bias. Conclusion: While chat analysis can provide some insights into market sentiment and potential trends, it's crucial to exercise caution and conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Consider diversifying your portfolio, setting realistic expectations, and staying informed about the latest developments in the cryptocurrency market.

This gauge displays a real-time technical analysis overview for your selected timeframe. The summary of Ethereum is based on the most popular technical indicators, such as Moving Averages, Oscillators/ /Ethereum /Technicals  Ethereum ETHUSDOANDA  Market open 3,375.4USD +43.3+1.30% As of today at 08:16 UTC+1 OverviewNewsIdeasDiscussions Technicals SeasonalsMarkets ETHUSD technical analysis This gauge displays a real-time technical analysis overview for your selected timeframe. The summary of Ethereum is based on the most popular technical indicators, such as Moving Averages, Oscillators and Pivots. Learn more 1 minute5 minutes15 minutes30 minutes1 hour2 hours4 hours1 day1 week1 monthMore Oscillators Neutral SellBuy Strong sellStrong buy Strong sellSellNeutralBuyStrong buy Sell1 Neutral9 Buy1 Summary Neutral SellBuy Strong sellStrong buy Strong sellSellNeutralBuyStrong buy Sell11 Neutral10 Buy5 Moving Averages Neutral SellBuy Strong sellStrong buy Strong sellSellNeutralBuyStrong buy Sell10 Neutral1 Buy4 Oscillators NameValueActionRelative Strength Index (14)43.49NeutralStochastic %K (14, 3, 3)30.11NeutralCommodity Channel Index (20)−84.92NeutralAverage Directional Index (14)26.47NeutralAwesome Oscillator−237.29NeutralMomentum (10)−516.80BuyMACD Level (12, 26)−50.52SellStochastic RSI Fast (3, 3, 14, 14)22.44NeutralWilliams Percent Range (14)−72.26NeutralBull Bear Power−299.02NeutralUltimate Oscillator (7, 14, 28)47.50Neutral Moving Averages NameValueActionExponential Moving Average (10)3,471.42SellSimple Moving Average (10)3,424.51SellExponential Moving Average (20)3,545.34SellSimple Moving Average (20)3,647.10SellExponential Moving Average (30)3,534.39SellSimple Moving Average (30)3,681.28SellExponential Moving Average (50)3,428.92SellSimple Moving Average (50)3,502.61SellExponential Moving Average (100)3,212.73BuySimple Moving Average (100)3,024.49BuyExponential Moving Average (200)3,060.31BuySimple Moving Average (200)2,989.07BuyIchimoku Base Line (9, 26, 52, 26)3,602.75NeutralVolume Weighted Moving Average (20)3,623.99SellHull Moving Average (9)3,420.66Sell Pivots PivotClassicFibonacciCamarillaWoodieDMR36,033.934,650.834,086.655,780.75—R24,650.834,122.493,959.874,760.38—R14,178.573,796.083,833.084,397.654,414.70P3,267.733,267.733,267.733,377.273,385.80S12,795.472,739.393,579.523,014.553,031.60S21,884.632,412.983,452.731,994.17—S3501.531,884.633,325.951,631.45— Be warned This info isn't a recommendation for what you should personally do, so please don't take the data as investment advice. As with any trade, always look first, then leap. Read more in the Terms of Use. Frequently Asked Questions  What do technical ratings mean? What are pivots in trading? What other indicators are used in calculations? Should I buy Ethereum? What are oscillators and what do they show? What are moving averages? Are they helpful? How reliable is technical analysis? Love in every #TradingView 90M+ Traders and investors use our platform. #1 Top website in the world when it comes to all things investing. 1.5M+ Mobile reviews with 4.9 average rating. No other fintech apps are more loved. 10M+ Custom scripts and ideas shared by our users.  @nasdaq.forex  @ozonlayerfx  @_evan_gibbs_  @TradingView  @fx.today  @paid_with_mark_22  @umaroff_0011_  @linda.cooper0  @captainkolbaska  @dehandreh  @chartfeed  @neo_inversion  @investment_expertt  @tradewithaks  @Cenobar  @half_bake_chef  @jackentrepreneur  @aku__adalah_ksatria  Whatever the trade Here's why          English Products Supercharts Pine Script™ Stock Screener ETF Screener Bond Screener Forex Screener Crypto Coins Screener Crypto Pairs Screener DEX Pairs Screener Stock Heatmap ETF Heatmap Crypto Heatmap Economic Calendar Earnings Calendar Sparks News TradingView Desktop Mobile app CME Group futures Eurex futures US stocks bundle Company About Features Pricing Social network Wall of Love Athletes Manifesto Careers Blog Security vulnerability Status page Terms of use Disclaimer Privacy policy Cookies policy Media kit Accessibility statement Tarot cards for traders TradingView merch store Community Refer a friend Ideas Scripts House rules Moderators Pine Script™ Wizards Chat Your festive recap For business Widgets Advertising Charting libraries Lightweight Charts™ Advanced Charts Trading Platform Brokerage integration Partner program Education program   Select market data provided by ICE Data ServicesSelect reference data provided by FactSet. Copyright © 2024 FactSet Research Systems Inc.© 2024 TradingView, Inc. BackClose Close Knowledge base / /Technical Ratings Back Technical Ratings  Definition Technical Ratings is a technical analysis tool that combines the ratings of several technical indicators to make it easier for traders and investors to find profitable trades. Calculations These are the criteria used to determine the rating of the individual indicators used. Note that changes from the last bar are used to determine falling or rising states: All Moving Averages Buy — MA value < price Sell — MA value > price Neutral — MA value = price Ichimoku Cloud Buy — lead line 1 > lead line 2 and base line > lead line 1 and conversion line > base line and price > conversion line Sell — lead line 1 < lead line 2 and base line < lead line 1 and conversion line < base line and price < conversion line Neutral — neither Buy nor Sell Relative Strength Index Buy — indicator < 30 and rising Sell — indicator > 70 and falling Neutral — neither Buy nor Sell Stochastic Buy — main and signal lines < 20 and main line > signal line Sell — main and signal lines > 80 and main line < signal line Neutral — neither Buy nor Sell Commodity Channel Index Buy — indicator < -100 and rising Sell — indicator > 100 and falling Neutral — neither Buy nor Sell Average Directional Index Buy — +DI line > -DI line and indicator > 20 and rising Sell — +DI line < -DI line and indicator > 20 and rising Neutral — neither Buy nor Sell Awesome Oscillator Buy — saucer and values are greater than 0, or cross over the zero line Sell — saucer and values are lower than 0, or cross under the zero line Neutral — neither Buy nor Sell Momentum Buy — indicator values are rising Sell — indicator values are falling Neutral — neither Buy nor Sell