OneFinity Kurs ONE

not asking for much just want one more kaleo szn

Ether $ETH options traders brace for March decline amid rising volatility Ether options traders are hedging against further losses as implied volatility (IV) surges, signaling bearish sentiment heading into March. According to derivatives trader Gordon Grant, IV on one-week options exceeded 80%, indicating daily price swings of nearly 4%. The market’s term structure has inverted, and demand for downside protection has grown, with traders adopting defensive strategies like put spreads to manage risk. Traders remain cautious as market uncertainty persists, with no clear signs of stabilization, The Block reported.

The crypto market is undergoing a shift. According to Eleanor Terrett , a crypto asset manager outlined three key cohorts of investors. First, there are the crypto enthusiasts who actively engage with the space daily. Second, mainstream self-directed investors see crypto occasionally but rarely engage in trading. Third, institutional investment professionals observe crypto from a strategic perspective. The market sentiment has taken a hit as category one investors, the largest segment, are not seeing immediate catalysts for growth. With regulatory clarity improving but no immediate hype drivers, the market has entered an unexciting phase. Chris Burniske emphasized that crypto has moved beyond its ideological phase. Now, the industry must focus on execution and large-scale adoption. While the space has been obsessed with discovering the “next big thing,” it is now transitioning into a phase of practical implementation. Consequently, the industry must prioritize efficiency, infrastructure, and user experience rather than speculative hype. Moreover, blockchain applications like global savings accounts and near-zero fee transactions require time to refine. Institutional adoption remains crucial , but major players are only now beginning to deploy solutions at scale. Hence, the industry must embrace this execution phase to drive sustained growth. Historically, the crypto sector thrived on speculation, fueled by constant innovation and market excitement. However, the current stage demands reliability and usability. The early years involved concepts that transformed disbelief into belief. Now, the focus is on making blockchain solutions mainstream and practical. Additionally, regulatory progress has encouraged institutional participation . As a result, financial institutions now view blockchain as a viable infrastructure rather than an experimental technology. This shift signifies that crypto is moving toward becoming an integrated financial system rather than a speculative playground. Burniske pointed out that early crypto systems were like “toys.” The industry must now refine and scale them into real-world solutions. Furthermore, while ideological investors may seek new frontiers, the market’s stability depends on long-term adoption and consistent execution. DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

The crypto market trembles. Bitcoin is displaying a Fear & Greed index plunging to 10 — an unprecedented extreme fear level not seen since the winter of 2022. As traders hold their breath, one burning question arises: is this panic a deadly trap… or a disguised opportunity? The Fear & Greed index, created by Alternative, is not just a gadget. It’s a seismograph of market emotions. On a scale of 0 to 100, it oscillates between collective euphoria and total dejection. Today, the needle has frozen at 10. A number that sends chills down the spine: the last time the price of bitcoin experienced such terror, it was worth $16,000. But behind the numbers, an unyielding mechanism reveals itself. This collapse in morale follows a 14% drop in bitcoin over the course of a week, plunging it below $85,000. The reasons? An explosive cocktail: massive liquidations ($2.16 billion in capitulation), regulatory pressure, and the shadow of collapsing memecoins. Yet, a glimmer of hope hides in history. In 2022, when the index reached similar levels , bitcoin began a slow recovery. The extreme lows of fear have often been the prelude to spectacular rebounds. As if the market, suffocated by its own fears, eventually regains its breath. Warren Buffett summed it up in one sentence: Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. A maxim that contrarian investors follow to the letter. Today, with the Fear & Greed index at its lowest, these strategists are pulling out their checkbooks. Their reasoning? General panic creates undervalued opportunities. Proof by past cycles. In January 2023, when the index brushed 10, bitcoin surged 40% in two months. The same scenario in July 2022: a 25% rebound after a fear low. The data is stubborn: the best returns often arise from discomfort. But beware of false hopes. If bitcoin appears to be on hold at $84,700, nothing guarantees an immediate rebound. In 2018, the index remained in the red zone for 11 months. The key? Distinguishing rational fear (like macroeconomic risks) from irrational panic. A tightrope act, where patience and discipline reign. The current panic is not an end, but a rite of passage. Bitcoin, accustomed to these emotional cycles, has already overcome crises far worse. However, this drop delivers two crucial lessons. First, the importance of understanding emotional indicators — these mirrors of our own excesses. Then, the necessity to think outside the herd. Because in the crypto arena, profits are often captured where others do not look. For investors, it’s time to keep a cool head. Monitor the fundamentals (institutional adoption, halving, technical innovations) rather than the waves of panic. And remember: even the darkest nights eventually give way to dawn. Bitcoin has already proven that it knows how to rise from its ashes. Will Solana do the same despite a 41% drop ?

The economic tensions between the United States and the European Union are reaching a new peak. Donald Trump, true to his protectionist policy, has just announced a spectacular increase in customs duties on European exports, bringing them to 25%. A brutal decision that far exceeds the 10% mentioned during his campaign and places Europe in a situation of diplomatic and economic emergency. The major powers of the Old Continent must now face a threat that could redraw global trade balances. From the White House, Donald Trump announced that all European exports would be taxed at 25%, as he claims that “the European Union was designed to annoy the United States.” This incendiary statement, which fits into the lineage of his hostile stance toward Brussels, reinforces a trade policy focused on protecting the American economy. Indeed, the American president had already targeted China, but this time, it is the historical allies of the United States who are to bear the pressure. The economic consequences are expected to be particularly severe for several European nations. Thus, Germany, Slovakia, Ireland, and Denmark are among the most exposed countries. Their dependence on exports to the American market, particularly in the automotive and pharmaceutical sectors, places them on the front lines of potential victims of these new customs barriers . For Brussels, this offensive is nothing less than a frontal attack on the European economy, and the Commission has immediately promised a response commensurate with the challenge. Europe does not intend to endure this offensive without reacting. Moreover, the European Commission has promised a firm and immediate response, although the exact nature of this counter-attack remains uncertain. Several options are on the table: retaliate with targeted taxes on American imports or intensify discussions to try to ease tensions. Europeans know that Donald Trump is a strategist of brutal negotiations, as he regularly uses trade threats as leverage. Behind the scenes, diplomatic efforts are intensifying. European negotiators are already in Washington, seeking a resolution before the implementation of these protectionist measures. Some observers remain cautious, reminding that Canada and Mexico, also threatened by tax increases, have obtained a reprieve. This fuels hope for a possible easing. However, a trade escalation remains a realistic scenario, which could weaken both the European economy and global trade. If this new trade war were to materialize, the repercussions could be considerable for the global economy. An increase in customs tariffs mechanically leads to a slowdown in trade, increased pressure on European businesses, and prolonged instability in financial markets. Brussels must now decide between direct confrontation or a pragmatic compromise. One certainty remains: economic relations between the United States and Europe will never be the same again.