Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesCopyBotsEarn
Investing in L2 vs. Investing in ETH: Which has a brighter future?

Investing in L2 vs. Investing in ETH: Which has a brighter future?

Odaily2024/06/19 06:40
By:Odaily

Original author: James Ho

Original translation: TechFlow

Investing in L2 vs ETH

Layer 2 (L2) solutions on Ethereum have made significant progress in the past few years. Currently, the total locked value (TVL) of Ethereum L2 exceeds $40 billion, compared to only $10 billion a year ago. On @l2 beat , you will find more than 50 L2 projects, but the top 5-10 projects account for more than 90% of the TVL.

After the implementation of the EIP-4844 proposal, transaction fees were significantly reduced, and transaction fees on platforms such as Base and Arbitrum were even less than US$0.01.

Investing in L2 vs. Investing in ETH: Which has a brighter future? image 0

Despite the huge progress L2 has made in technology and usage, L2 tokens have generally performed poorly as liquidity investments (although as venture investments they have performed very well). You can find many jokes and memes about the poor performance of L2 tokens relative to ETH.

We reviewed the valuations of major L2s relative to ETH. One notable observation is that despite the increase in the number of listed L2s, their total fully diluted valuation (FDV) as a percentage of ETH has remained constant.

Two years ago, the only listed L2s were Optimism and Polygon, with 8% of ETH’s FDV. Today, we have L2 projects like Arbitrum, Starkware, zkSync, and others, with 9% of ETH’s FDV.

Investing in L2 vs. Investing in ETH: Which has a brighter future? image 1

Every new L2 token listed actually dilutes the valuation of previously listed L2 tokens.

Investing in L2 vs. Investing in ETH: Which has a brighter future? image 2

The result of investing in L2 tokens is significant underperformance relative to ETH. The returns over the past 12 months are as follows:

  • ETH: +105%

  • OP: +77%

  • MATIC: -3%

  • ARB: -12%

The FDV of major L2 tokens has long been around $10B. To some extent, this is fairly arbitrary, and market participants have not had a strong reason to explain why it is $1B and not $2B or $300M. Ultimately, there is significant supply pressure due to demand for liquidity and/or large unlocks.

The aforementioned L2 generates $20-30 million in monthly fees. Since the implementation of EIP-4844, fees have dropped to $3-4 million per month, with an annualized fee of about $40-50 million.

Investing in L2 vs. Investing in ETH: Which has a brighter future? image 3

Includes: ptimism, arbitrum, polygon, starkware, zksync

Currently, the total FDV of major L2 tokens is about $40 billion, with annualized fees of $40 million and a valuation multiple of about 1,000x.

This is in stark contrast to large DeFi protocols, which typically trade at valuation multiples between 15-60x (based on last month’s annualized fees):

  • DYDX: 60x

  • SNX: 50x

  • PENDLE: 50x

  • LDO: 40 times

  • AAVE: 20x

  • MKR: 15x

  • GMX: 15x

As more L2 projects come to market, the FDV of L2 tokens may continue to be pressured and diluted. There is too much supply in the market for the liquid market to easily support.

Conclusion

  • In the long term, L2 is likely to generate significant fee income. L2 generates $150M in fees per year (including Base, Blast, Scroll), and this number is likely to grow significantly as L2 activity increases.

  • The above is not specific to a particular L2 project, but rather a broad observation about the category as a whole. It seems difficult to buy a basket of L2 tokens with ~$40B FDV and ~$40M in fees (1000x) and expect them to outperform ETH in the long term.

  • Clearly, there is no shortage of blockspace between L2, high throughput chains like Solana, Sui, Aptos, etc. The limiting factor is the applications that use that blockspace. I expect more focus to be placed on the application layer in the future, and that liquidity markets will reward the application layer over the infrastructure layer in the coming years.

  • In the last cycle, it was more common for projects to be listed significantly early. MATIC was listed on the liquid market with a FDV of less than $50 million and is now over $5 billion, an increase of more than 100 times. However, this is not the case with the recent $OP , $ARB , $STRK , $ZK , and most other L2 tokens that may eventually be listed.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Locked for new tokens.
APR up to 10%. Always on, always get airdrop.
Lock now!

You may also like

Can Bitcoin Hit $110K? Analyzing $2.24B Whale Influence on its Value

Unraveling the Potential Impact of a $2.24B Whale-Driven BTC Accumulation on Bitcoin's Pursuit of a $110K High

Coineagle2025/01/23 21:11

Insights from Bitcoin’s Recent Surge: Predicting its Stance in 2025

Analyzing Recent Demand Trends to Forecast Bitcoin's Performance in the Next Four Years

Coineagle2025/01/23 21:11

President Trump and First Lady’s Meme Coins Dominated by Crypto Whales: Chainalysis

These whales, who each hold $10 million or more in the tokens, account for 94% of the combined token supply.

CryptoNews2025/01/23 21:11

a16z: A New Era of Crypto, What Should the SEC Do?

The SEC is at a critical moment in deciding the future of cryptocurrency asset regulation.

Chaincatcher2025/01/23 20:55