Coinbase disputes SEC’s crypto authority in final bid to toss regulator’s suit
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission overstepped its authority when it classified Coinbase-listed cryptocurrencies as securities, the exchange has argued in its final bid to dismiss a lawsuit by the securities regulator.
In an Oct. 24 filing in a New York District Court, Coinbase chastised the SEC, claiming its definition for what qualifies as a security was too wide and contested that the cryptocurrencies the exchange lists are not under the regulator’s purview.
“The SEC’s authority is limited to securities transactions. Not every parting of capital with a hope of gain qualifies, and trades over Coinbase are only securities transactions if they involve ‘investment contracts.’ The transactions at issue here do not.”
Coinbase claimed the SEC has undertaken a “radical expansion of its own authority” and claimed jurisdiction “over essentially all investment activity,” which only Congress is entitled to do under the major questions doctrine.
In an Oct. 24 X post, Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal echoed the claims, saying the SEC’s definitions have “no limiting function at all.”
By arguing that any purchase in which the buyer hopes for an increase in value constitutes an investment contract-and therefore a security-the SEC is attempting a radical expansion of its own authority. Only Congress can do that as the major questions doctrine makes clear. 2/3
— paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) October 24, 2023
Coinbase’s recent filing comes in response to the SEC’s Oct. 3 rebuttal where it asked the court to reject Coinbase’s dismissal motion, iterating its belief that various cryptocurrencies Coinbase listed were investment contracts under the Howey test.
Related: Securities regulators oppose special treatment of crypto in Coinbase case
The SEC sued Coinbase on June 6 , claiming the exchange violated U.S. securities laws by listing several tokens it considers securities and not registering with the regulator.
Coinbase filed the motion for judgment on June 29 arguing the SEC was abusing its power and violating Coinbase’s due process rights.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla, who oversees the case, may ask Coinbase and the SEC to appear in court for oral arguments and then issue judgment on the case, dismiss it, or move for it to be heard in front of a jury.
Magazine: Hall of Flame: Crypto lawyer Irina Heaver on death threats, lawsuit predictions
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Why TradFi firms could turn to bitcoin margin loans: Maple CEO
Maple’s Sid Powell said that TradFi firms have been in contact with the firm about lending and borrowing in crypto
The Daily: ECB President Lagarde rejects bitcoin for Eurozone reserves while the Czech central bank considers it and more
European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said bitcoin is not an option as a reserve asset for the Eurozone’s central bank reserves, citing liquidity, security and regulatory concerns.Meanwhile, the Czech National Bank approved a proposal from Governor Aleš Michl to assess diversifying some of its country’s reserves into bitcoin.
'Inevitable collapse': Trump’s crypto push sparks concern at Paul Singer's Elliott Management: FT
The hedge fund said in a new investor letter that the “inevitable collapse” of the crypto bubble “could wreak havoc,” according to the Financial Times.Elliott’s Paul Singer has never been a fan of crypto, telling WSJ in 2023 that cryptocurrencies are “completely lacking in any value.”
Kiyosaki Dumps Gold and Silver, Projects Bitcoin at $250K by 2025